In the dynamic cloud landscape of 2026, Kubernetes has solidified its position as the de facto operating system for modern applications. However, while the core Kubernetes API provides a consistent interface, the three hyperscale cloud providers—Google Cloud (GCP), Amazon Web Services (AWS), and Microsoft Azure—each offer a unique architectural approach to their managed Kubernetes services.
This blog post will demystify the architectural nuances, highlight current pricing models, and delve into the technical limitations of GKE (Google Kubernetes Engine), EKS (Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service), and AKS (Azure Kubernetes Service), ensuring you gain a comprehensive understanding.
Understanding the Core: Kubernetes Basics
Before diving into the specifics, let’s quickly recap what Kubernetes is and how managed services fit in.
At its heart, a Kubernetes cluster is made up of:
- Control Plane (Master Nodes): The “brain” of the cluster. It schedules applications, maintains desired states, records configuration data, and orchestrates communication. Key components include
kube-apiserver,etcd,kube-scheduler, andkube-controller-manager. - Data Plane (Worker Nodes): These are the machines (VMs, bare metal, serverless containers) where your applications (pods) actually run. Each worker node runs
kubelet(an agent for the control plane) and a container runtime (like containerd). - Pods: The smallest deployable units in Kubernetes, encapsulating one or more containers, storage resources, a unique network IP, and options that govern how the container(s) should run.
Managed Kubernetes Services like GKE, EKS, and AKS abstract away the complexity of managing the Control Plane. This means the cloud provider handles its availability, scaling, upgrades, and security, freeing you to focus on your applications. You are primarily responsible for the Data Plane (or in some cases, the provider even manages that for you!).
1. High-Level Architecture Comparison
While all three providers offer a managed control plane, their implementation of the data plane and the degree of abstraction vary significantly.
Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE)
GKE is renowned for its automation and integration with Google’s planetary-scale infrastructure. It offers two primary modes:
- GKE Standard: You manage your worker nodes (VM instances organized into Node Pools), but Google handles the Kubernetes control plane. You have control over node types, auto-scaling configurations, and operating systems.
- GKE Autopilot: The “serverless Kubernetes” experience. Google manages both the control plane and the worker nodes entirely. You pay per pod resource requests, not per node, eliminating the need to select or manage underlying VMs. It automatically handles node sizing, scaling, and patching.
GKE Architecture Diagram:
Imagine your cluster as a two-part system. The top part (Control Plane) is fully managed by Google across multiple zones for high availability. The bottom part (Nodes) is where your Pods run.
- How it Works:
- Control Plane: Google provides a highly available, multi-zone control plane. You interact with it via the Kubernetes API server.
- Networking: GKE leverages Google’s advanced global network. Its Dataplane V2 uses eBPF (extended Berkeley Packet Filter) for highly efficient, secure, and observable networking between Pods and Services.
- Standard Data Plane: You define Node Pools (groups of similar VMs). The GKE Cluster Autoscaler dynamically adds or removes nodes based on demand.
- Autopilot Data Plane: You simply deploy your Pods. Google automatically provisions, scales, and manages the underlying compute infrastructure (VMs) without you ever seeing them.
- Pricing: Control plane costs $0.10/hour, but it’s free for one Zonal cluster or for Autopilot clusters. You pay for the underlying compute (VMs for Standard, Pod requests for Autopilot).
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS)
EKS is deeply integrated with the vast AWS ecosystem, offering significant flexibility and control, often preferred by those who want to “tinker” more with the underlying infrastructure.
- Managed Control Plane: AWS manages the Kubernetes control plane, distributing it across multiple Availability Zones to ensure high availability.
- Worker Nodes Options:
- Managed Node Groups: AWS automates the provisioning, scaling, and lifecycle management of EC2 instances (VMs) for your worker nodes.
- Self-Managed Nodes: You manage your own EC2 instances as worker nodes, giving you maximum control over AMIs, instance types, and patching.
- AWS Fargate: A serverless compute engine for containers. With EKS Fargate, you can run pods without provisioning, managing, or scaling EC2 instances. You only pay for the compute resources consumed by your pods.
EKS Architecture Diagram:
EKS integrates tightly with your AWS VPC. The control plane lives in an AWS-managed VPC, and your worker nodes live in your VPC.
- How it Works:
- Control Plane: AWS provisions and manages a highly available Kubernetes control plane across multiple Availability Zones within an AWS-managed VPC.
- Networking: EKS uses the VPC CNI (Container Network Interface) plugin. This CNI directly assigns a private IP address from your VPC subnet to each Pod.
- Data Plane (Managed Node Groups/Self-Managed): Your worker nodes are EC2 instances running within your AWS VPC. Auto-scaling is managed by the cluster autoscaler or, increasingly, by Karpenter (an open-source, high-performance node provisioner).
- Data Plane (Fargate): For Fargate pods, AWS provisions and manages the underlying compute infrastructure (isolated EC2 instances) in your VPC, but you don’t interact with them directly. Each Fargate pod still gets a VPC IP.
- Pricing: EKS control plane costs $0.10/hour. You pay for the underlying EC2 instances (for Managed/Self-Managed Nodes) or for the compute consumed by Fargate pods.
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
AKS aims to bridge enterprise governance requirements with a developer-friendly experience. It integrates well with Azure’s identity and networking services.
- Managed Control Plane: Microsoft Azure manages the Kubernetes control plane.
- Worker Nodes Options:
- Node Pools: You define node pools (groups of similar Azure VMs) that run your pods. AKS supports different OS types (Linux, Windows) and VM sizes within these pools.
- Virtual Nodes (Azure Container Instances – ACI): This feature allows AKS to burst workloads to serverless Azure Container Instances. If your cluster needs more capacity quickly, ACI pods can be provisioned within seconds without needing to scale up underlying VMs. You pay for the ACI resources consumed.
- Automatic Mode (New for 2026): Similar to GKE Autopilot, this mode simplifies node management by automatically scaling and patching worker nodes, abstracting the underlying VMs from the user.
AKS Architecture Diagram:
AKS integrates with Azure Virtual Networks (VNet). The control plane is logically managed by Azure, while your worker nodes reside in your VNet.
- How it Works:
- Control Plane: Azure manages the Kubernetes control plane components, ensuring their high availability and secure operation.
- Networking: AKS supports both Azure CNI (assigns VNet IPs to Pods, similar to AWS VPC CNI) and Kubernetes overlay networking (Pod IPs are from a private CIDR, requiring fewer VNet IPs). Overlay networking is often the default or preferred for simplicity.
- Data Plane (Node Pools): Your worker nodes are Azure Virtual Machines (VMs) organized into Node Pools within your Azure VNet. Scaling is handled by the Cluster Autoscaler.
- Data Plane (Virtual Nodes/ACI): For bursting, AKS leverages Azure Container Instances. These are serverless containers that can integrate with your VNet for quick scaling.
- Pricing: The AKS control plane is free for Standard clusters. For Premium SLA (guaranteed uptime), it costs $0.10/hour. You pay for the underlying Azure VMs or ACI consumption.
2. Technical Feature Breakdown (2026)
This table summarizes key technical differences and how they’ve evolved by 2026.
| Feature / Aspect | GCP GKE | AWS EKS | Azure AKS |
| Control Plane Cost | $0.10/hr (Free for 1 Zonal/Autopilot) | $0.10/hr | Free (Standard) / $0.10/hr (Premium SLA) |
| Control Plane Uptime SLA | 99.95% (Regional) / 99.5% (Zonal) | 99.9% | 99.95% (Premium) / 99.5% (Standard) |
| Node Management Options | Standard (VMs), Autopilot (Serverless) | Managed Node Groups (EC2), Self-Managed (EC2), Fargate (Serverless) | Node Pools (VMs), Virtual Nodes (ACI Serverless), Automatic Mode (Serverless) |
| Kubernetes Versioning | Very fast adoption (often first day/week) | Fast adoption (typically 2-4 weeks after upstream) | Fast adoption (typically 2-4 weeks after upstream) |
| Upgrade Management | Fully Automatic (Release Channels), Manual for Nodes | Manual trigger for CP and Nodes (using eksctl or AWS Console) | Semi-Automatic (Node Image Upgrades), Manual for CP |
| Max Nodes/Cluster (Typical) | 15,000+ (Google’s scale) | ~3,000 (VPC CNI limits can constrain) | ~5,000 (with VMSS) |
| Node Scaling Tool | GKE Cluster Autoscaler | Karpenter (Recommended Industry Standard) | Cluster Autoscaler / HPA with Virtual Nodes |
| Default Networking Model | Dataplane V2 (eBPF-based) | VPC CNI (IP-hungry, direct VPC IP for Pods) | Azure CNI / Overlay (Varies by configuration) |
| Identity Integration | IAM | IAM | Entra ID (Azure AD) |
| Windows Container Support | Yes (in specific Node Pools) | Yes (with specific AMIs) | Excellent (with dedicated Windows Node Pools) |
3. Deep-Dive: Limitations & “Gotchas” (2026 Perspective)
While these services are powerful, understanding their architectural limitations is crucial for robust designs.
GCP GKE: The “Opinionated” Edge
GKE’s strength lies in its automation, but this can lead to a loss of granular control.
- Limitation: Managed Add-on Rigidity: GKE manages core cluster components (like
kube-dns,kube-proxyin some modes, or metrics-server) as add-ons. If you try to manually modify their resource limits, anti-affinity rules, or other configurations, GKE’s control plane will often revert your changes to its desired state, potentially causing unexpected behavior. - The “Zonal” Trap (still relevant): While GKE offers Zonal clusters for cost savings (and the control plane is then free), if the specific Google Cloud zone your control plane resides in experiences an outage, your cluster API will be unavailable. For production, Regional Clusters (where the control plane is replicated across multiple zones) are mandatory, accepting the $0.10/hr fee.
- Networking Flexibility: While Dataplane V2 is powerful, deep network customizations for
kube-proxymight be more challenging compared to EKS.
AWS EKS: The “VPC CNI” and Control Overhead
EKS’s deep integration with VPC and its “bring your own tools” philosophy comes with specific challenges.
- Limitation: IP Exhaustion (Still a concern for some): The default VPC CNI assigns a unique secondary private IP address from your VPC subnet to every single Pod. If you have many pods per node or use small subnets, you can still hit IP address limits before you run out of CPU/memory on your EC2 instances, leading to
PodFailederrors. While AWS has improved this with Prefix Delegation and Custom Networking, it remains a common design consideration. - Upgrade Management Overhead: Unlike GKE’s fully automated channels, EKS control plane and node group upgrades are still distinct, manual (or script-driven) operations. You need to manage the timing and potential downtime (though rolling updates minimize it). Karpenter has significantly eased node scaling, but node upgrades still require attention.
- Observability Initial Setup: While AWS offers many observability tools (CloudWatch, X-Ray), getting a comprehensive, integrated observability stack (logs, metrics, traces) up and running for EKS often requires more initial configuration and integration work compared to GKE’s out-of-the-box experience with Cloud Operations.
Azure AKS: The “Resource Group” Conundrum and Control Plane Access
AKS is powerful but can be tricky with its resource group management and control plane access.
- Limitation: “Node Resource Group” (MC_…) Manipulation: AKS automatically creates a secondary Azure Resource Group (named
MC_<resource-group-name>_<cluster-name>_<region>) to hold all the cluster-managed infrastructure like Virtual Machine Scale Sets (VMSS), Load Balancers, and managed disks. Manually modifying or deleting resources within this MC_ resource group is highly discouraged and can lead to a broken cluster state that is notoriously difficult to recover. Always manage these resources via Kubernetes objects. - Control Plane Access: While the control plane is managed, directly inspecting its components (like
etcdlogs) is not possible, similar to other providers. Troubleshooting control plane issues often relies on Azure diagnostic tools and logs. - Provisioning Speed (Historical): Historically, AKS cluster creation times could be longer than GKE. While improvements have been made by 2026, occasional delays can still be observed when provisioning large or complex clusters.
- Networking Complexity: While Azure CNI and Overlay options provide flexibility, choosing the right one for your network design (especially with custom VNet integrations) requires careful planning to avoid IP overlap or routing issues.
4. Which One Should You Choose in 2026?
The “best” Kubernetes service depends entirely on your existing cloud strategy, team expertise, and specific requirements.
- Choose GKE if:
- You prioritize maximum automation, simplicity, and a “hands-off” experience, especially with Autopilot.
- You value cutting-edge networking performance and security offered by Dataplane V2 (eBPF).
- You want fast access to the latest Kubernetes features and stability.
- Your organization is already invested in Google Cloud, its identity, and monitoring solutions.
- Choose EKS if:
- Your organization has a deep existing investment and operational expertise in the AWS ecosystem (VPC, IAM, EC2, RDS, S3).
- You require granular control over your worker nodes (e.g., custom AMIs, specific instance types for compliance).
- You plan to heavily leverage advanced tools like Karpenter for intelligent node provisioning.
- You need the flexibility to mix and match node types (Managed, Self-Managed, Fargate) for different workloads.
- Choose AKS if:
- You are a Microsoft-centric organization, heavily reliant on Entra ID (formerly Azure AD) for identity and access management, and Azure DevOps for CI/CD.
- You require robust Windows Container support as a first-class citizen.
- You need to integrate closely with other Azure services and enterprise governance features.
- You appreciate the option to burst workloads rapidly using Azure Container Instances (Virtual Nodes).
Conclusion
In 2026, all three providers offer incredibly robust and mature managed Kubernetes services. While the core Kubernetes API remains consistent, the underlying architecture, operational nuances, and ecosystem integrations provide distinct experiences. By understanding these differences and the potential “gotchas,” you can make an informed decision that best aligns with your organization’s strategy and ensures a successful Kubernetes journey.
Leave a Reply